Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the article is to determine the cultural dimensions of the problem of regional integration processes in the post-Soviet space. Methodology. Research methods comprise the application of a comparative and systematic approach to the analysis of integration processes in the post-Soviet space. Metacultural and multicultural transformations are analyzed as a dialogue of cultures. The scientific novelty lies in revealing the role of regional integration institutions in the context of the formation of post-Soviet cultures. Local modules of integrative processes and cultural signs of integration are determined as an institution for the formation of the post-Soviet space in the context of the formation of political and economic relations. Conclusions. The results of the activities of regional institutions for the integration of independent countries are both counter-fractal, and harmonizing, synthesizing in nature. Implicitly dominant economic, cultural integration is the culture of everyday life, which encourages cultural dialogue in the informal dimension. The culture of everyday life became a unifying integrative factor afterward, which carries the mentality of gomo soveticus. The results of the agreements are explicitly recorded in the regulatory documents of the SDV, GUAM, SCO, and other regional modules of integration processes. Regional initiatives, in contrast to the globalist, integrative and disintegrative trends, are an active factor in harmonizing the intercultural dialogue of independent countries and have shown their viability. ; Мета статті – визначити культурологічні виміри проблеми регіональних інтеграційних процесів у пострадянському просторі. Методологія. Методи дослідження становлять застосування компаративного та системного підходів щодо аналізу інтегративних процесів у пострадянському просторі. Метакультурні та мультикультурні трансформації аналізуються як діалог культур. Наукова новизна полягає у розкритті ролі регіональних інституції інтеграції в контексті формування пострадянських культур. Визначаються локальні модулі інтегративних процесів та культурні ознаки інтеграції як інституції формування пострадянського простору в контексті утворення економічних відносин. Висновки. Результати діяльності регіональних інституцій щодо інтеграції незалежних країн мають як конфрактичний, так і гармонізуючий, синтезуючий характер. Імпліцитно домінантою економічної, культурної інтеграції є культура повсякдення, яка спонукає до культурного діалогу у неформальному вимірі. Культура повсякдення стала об'єднуючим інтегративним фактором тому, що несе в собі ментальність gomo soveticus. Експліцитно результати домовленостей фіксуються в регулятивних документах СДВ, ГУАМ, ШОС та інших регіональних модулів інтеграційних процесів. Регіональні ініціативи, на відміну від глобалістичних, інтегративних і дезінтегративних тенденцій є активним фактором гармонізації міжкультурного діалогу незалежних країн, засвідчили свою життєздатність.

The purpose of the article is an analysis of the cultural formation of the post-Soviet space in the age of globalization. Methodology. The research methods represent theoretical and interpretative models of analysis of the mechanisms of cultural formation in the context of the post-Soviet space of modern culture, in particular, the use of comparative and systematic approaches. The culture of everyday life is viewed in the context of the historical and cultural transformations of the post-totalitarian regime. The scientific novelty is to reveal the peculiarities of the interpretation and interaction of cultures as reflective attitudes, in particular characterized by holism (the primacy of the system) as a system-consolidating turn and anti-holism (the dominant part, subsystems), which attests to the initiatives of the anti-globalist movements. It has been proved that the globalization of culture cannot be described only as an extensive growth of information technologies. The essence is to homogenize and unify the exchange of cultures. Conclusions. Factors of cultural integration in the context of globalization press are identified as an anti-globalization project to counteract capital expansion and cultural colonization. It is proved that the universalization of communication and information space leads to supra-systemic cultural entities (emergence of planetary information government, communicative ethics, synthesism of reception and production of information on the Internet, etc.). The emphasis is put on the formation of a synthetic cultural discipline - totalology, which makes it possible to understand the processes of globalization and integration in the post-Soviet space on the basis of the application of meta cultural analytical tools within the theory of large systems. ; The purpose of the article is an analysis of the cultural formation of the post-Soviet space in the age of globalization. Methodology. The research methods represent theoretical and interpretative models of analysis of the mechanisms of cultural formation in the context of the post-Soviet space of modern culture, in particular, the use of comparative and systematic approaches. The culture of everyday life is viewed in the context of the historical and cultural transformations of the post-totalitarian regime. The scientific novelty is to reveal the peculiarities of the interpretation and interaction of cultures as reflective attitudes, in particular characterized by holism (the primacy of the system) as a system-consolidating turn and anti-holism (the dominant part, subsystems), which attests to the initiatives of the anti-globalist movements. It has been proved that the globalization of culture cannot be described only as an extensive growth of information technologies. The essence is to homogenize and unify the exchange of cultures. Conclusions. Factors of cultural integration in the context of globalization press are identified as an anti-globalization project to counteract capital expansion and cultural colonization. It is proved that the universalization of communication and information space leads to supra-systemic cultural entities (emergence of planetary information government, communicative ethics, synthesism of reception and production of information on the Internet, etc.). The emphasis is put on the formation of a synthetic cultural discipline - totalology, which makes it possible to understand the processes of globalization and integration in the post-Soviet space on the basis of the application of meta cultural analytical tools within the theory of large systems.

The purpose of the article is to determine the cultural dimensions of the problem of regional integration processes in the post-Soviet space. Methodology. Research methods comprise the application of a comparative and systematic approach to the analysis of integration processes in the post-Soviet space. Metacultural and multicultural transformations are analyzed as a dialogue of cultures. The scientific novelty lies in revealing the role of regional integration institutions in the context of the formation of post-Soviet cultures. Local modules of integrative processes and cultural signs of integration are determined as an institution for the formation of the post-Soviet space in the context of the formation of political and economic relations. Conclusions. The results of the activities of regional institutions for the integration of independent countries are both counter-fractal, and harmonizing, synthesizing in nature. Implicitly dominant economic, cultural integration is the culture of everyday life, which encourages cultural dialogue in the informal dimension. The culture of everyday life became a unifying integrative factor afterward, which carries the mentality of gomo soveticus. The results of the agreements are explicitly recorded in the regulatory documents of the SDV, GUAM, SCO, and other regional modules of integration processes. Regional initiatives, in contrast to the globalist, integrative and disintegrative trends, are an active factor in harmonizing the intercultural dialogue of independent countries and have shown their viability. ; Мета статті – визначити культурологічні виміри проблеми регіональних інтеграційних процесів у пострадянському просторі. Методологія. Методи дослідження становлять застосування компаративного та системного підходів щодо аналізу інтегративних процесів у пострадянському просторі. Метакультурні та мультикультурні трансформації аналізуються як діалог культур. Наукова новизна полягає у розкритті ролі регіональних інституції інтеграції в контексті формування пострадянських культур. Визначаються локальні модулі інтегративних процесів та культурні ознаки інтеграції як інституції формування пострадянського простору в контексті утворення економічних відносин. Висновки. Результати діяльності регіональних інституцій щодо інтеграції незалежних країн мають як конфрактичний, так і гармонізуючий, синтезуючий характер. Імпліцитно домінантою економічної, культурної інтеграції є культура повсякдення, яка спонукає до культурного діалогу у неформальному вимірі. Культура повсякдення стала об'єднуючим інтегративним фактором тому, що несе в собі ментальність gomo soveticus. Експліцитно результати домовленостей фіксуються в регулятивних документах СДВ, ГУАМ, ШОС та інших регіональних модулів інтеграційних процесів. Регіональні ініціативи, на відміну від глобалістичних, інтегративних і дезінтегративних тенденцій є активним фактором гармонізації міжкультурного діалогу незалежних країн, засвідчили свою життєздатність.

The purpose of the article is an analysis of the cultural formation of the post-Soviet space in the age of globalization. Methodology. The research methods represent theoretical and interpretative models of analysis of the mechanisms of cultural formation in the context of the post-Soviet space of modern culture, in particular, the use of comparative and systematic approaches. The culture of everyday life is viewed in the context of the historical and cultural transformations of the post-totalitarian regime. The scientific novelty is to reveal the peculiarities of the interpretation and interaction of cultures as reflective attitudes, in particular characterized by holism (the primacy of the system) as a system-consolidating turn and anti-holism (the dominant part, subsystems), which attests to the initiatives of the anti-globalist movements. It has been proved that the globalization of culture cannot be described only as an extensive growth of information technologies. The essence is to homogenize and unify the exchange of cultures. Conclusions. Factors of cultural integration in the context of globalization press are identified as an anti-globalization project to counteract capital expansion and cultural colonization. It is proved that the universalization of communication and information space leads to supra-systemic cultural entities (emergence of planetary information government, communicative ethics, synthesism of reception and production of information on the Internet, etc.). The emphasis is put on the formation of a synthetic cultural discipline - totalology, which makes it possible to understand the processes of globalization and integration in the post-Soviet space on the basis of the application of meta cultural analytical tools within the theory of large systems. ; The purpose of the article is an analysis of the cultural formation of the post-Soviet space in the age of globalization. Methodology. The research methods represent theoretical and interpretative models of analysis of the mechanisms of cultural formation in the context of the post-Soviet space of modern culture, in particular, the use of comparative and systematic approaches. The culture of everyday life is viewed in the context of the historical and cultural transformations of the post-totalitarian regime. The scientific novelty is to reveal the peculiarities of the interpretation and interaction of cultures as reflective attitudes, in particular characterized by holism (the primacy of the system) as a system-consolidating turn and anti-holism (the dominant part, subsystems), which attests to the initiatives of the anti-globalist movements. It has been proved that the globalization of culture cannot be described only as an extensive growth of information technologies. The essence is to homogenize and unify the exchange of cultures. Conclusions. Factors of cultural integration in the context of globalization press are identified as an anti-globalization project to counteract capital expansion and cultural colonization. It is proved that the universalization of communication and information space leads to supra-systemic cultural entities (emergence of planetary information government, communicative ethics, synthesism of reception and production of information on the Internet, etc.). The emphasis is put on the formation of a synthetic cultural discipline - totalology, which makes it possible to understand the processes of globalization and integration in the post-Soviet space on the basis of the application of meta cultural analytical tools within the theory of large systems.